|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
agate Site Admin
Joined: 17 May 2006 Posts: 5694 Location: Oregon
|
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 5:56 pm Post subject: (Abst.) IFN-beta use doesn't prevent disability in RRMS |
|
|
From JAMA Neurology, February 1, 2013:
Quote: |
Interferon Beta Use and Disability Prevention in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
Benjamin M. Greenberg, MD, MHS; Laura Balcer, MD; Peter A. Calabresi, MD; Bruce Cree, MD, PhD; Anne Cross, MD; Teresa Frohman, PA-C; Ralf Gold, MD; Eva Havrdova, MD, PhD; Bernhard Hemmer, MD; Bernd C. Kieseier, MD; Robert Lisak, MD; Aaron Miller, MD; Michael K. Racke, MD; Lawrence Steinman, MD; Olaf Stuve, MD, PhD; Heinz Wiendl, MD; Elliot Frohman, MD, PhD
JAMA Neurol. 2013;70(2):248-251.
Interferon beta is widely prescribed to treat multiple sclerosis (MS); however, its relationship with disability progression has yet to be established.
Objective:
To investigate the association between interferon beta exposure and disability progression in patients with relapsing-remitting MS.
Design, Setting, and Patients:
Retrospective cohort study based on prospectively collected data (1985-2008) from British Columbia, Canada. Patients with relapsing-remitting MS treated with interferon beta (n = 868) were compared with untreated contemporary (n = 829) and historical (n = 959) cohorts.
Main Outcome Measures:
The main outcome measure was time from interferon beta treatment eligibility (baseline) to a confirmed and sustained score of 6 (requiring a cane to walk 100 m; confirmed at >150 days with no measurable improvement) on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) (range, 0-10, with higher scores indicating higher disability). A multivariable Cox regression model with interferon beta treatment included as a time-varying covariate was used to assess the hazard of disease progression associated with interferon beta treatment. Analyses also included propensity score adjustment to address confounding by indication.
Results:
The median active follow-up times (first to last EDSS measurement) were as follows: for the interferon beta–treated cohort, 5.1 years (interquartile range [IQR], 3.0-7.0 years); for the contemporary control cohort, 4.0 years (IQR, 2.1-6.4 years); and for the historical control cohort, 10.8 years (IQR, 6.3-14.7 years). The observed outcome rates for reaching a sustained EDSS score of 6 were 10.8%, 5.3%, and 23.1% in the 3 cohorts, respectively. After adjustment for potential baseline confounders (sex, age, disease duration, and EDSS score), exposure to interferon beta was not associated with a statistically significant difference in the hazard of reaching an EDSS score of 6 when either the contemporary control cohort (hazard ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.92-1.83; P = .14) or the historical control cohort (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.58-1.02; P = .07) were considered. Further adjustment for comorbidities and socioeconomic status, where possible, did not change interpretations, and propensity score adjustment did not substantially change the results.
Conclusion:
Among patients with relapsing-remitting MS, administration of interferon beta was not associated with a reduction in progression of disability.
|
Hmmm. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You can edit your posts in this forum You can delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|